Not gonna lie, this reading confused me at first. I wasn’t sure how what I was reading was relevant to the course material, even though I found it quite interesting. The link between universality in written language, such as numerals and the alphabet was interesting to me. Also, his example of pictograms started the reading in a very logical order where he continued to link this idea of universality into other fields. Moving into the context of computers, he continues the argument for universality in a coherent manner, but honestly, it was just a little confusing to me. I felt like it was super drawn out, rather than straight to the point which may have been more helpful.